Filters▼
Sort
Sorting applies immediately after selection.
Categories
Tags
Top 20Showing 1–1 of 1
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
James C. Scott • 1998
The document "Seeing Like a State" analyzes how large-scale, state-imposed schemes aimed at societal improvement often fail due to inherent flaws in centralized planning and state simplification. It argues that states prioritize "legibility"—standardizing and quantifying complex social and natural realities—to facilitate administrative control and appropriation, frequently disregarding crucial local knowledge (*metis*). High-modernist ideologies, combined with authoritarian state power and a weak civil society, lead to tragic social engineering disasters in areas like urban planning, agriculture, and population resettlement. The text critiques this top-down approach, emphasizing the importance of practical, adaptive knowledge and the resilience of informal systems that continually resist or subvert rigid state designs, demonstrating the profound limitations of abstract, universal planning.