On War cover
CoreOfBooks

On War

Carl von Clausewitz • 1966 • 432 pages original

Difficulty
4/5
37
pages summary
86
min read
audio version
0
articles
PDF

Quick Summary

This military treatise meticulously dissects the principles of warfare, contrasting offensive and defensive strategies. It emphasizes the intrinsic strength of the defensive when employed with a view towards a decisive counterstroke, rather than passive resistance. The text details the composition and deployment of military forces—infantry, cavalry, artillery—and their interaction with diverse terrains like mountains, rivers, and forests. Logistical aspects, including subsistence and communication lines, are explored, alongside the strategic implications of fortresses, popular armament, and deep retreats. The author critically evaluates historical military theories, highlighting the importance of concentrated force, adaptability, and understanding the enemy's intentions to achieve victory, whether through grand battles or prolonged attrition.

Chat is for subscribers

Upgrade to ask questions and chat with this book.

Key Ideas

1

The defensive form of war is intrinsically stronger than the offensive when properly leveraged.

2

Concentration of force against the enemy's center of gravity is paramount for decisive victory.

3

Logistical support, including subsistence and secure lines of communication, is fundamental to military operations.

4

Terrain features significantly influence military tactics and strategy, necessitating adaptable approaches.

5

National armament and popular support can provide a powerful, diffused form of defense, particularly in protracted conflicts.

Introduction to Clausewitz's Theories

Clausewitz's theories logically stemmed from Napoleon's teachings, likened to Darwin's work in biology for defining national life-history. He approached the struggle without moral judgment, treating conflict as a natural phenomenon like famine. His analysis focused on the inherent conditions of warfare rather than ethical considerations, providing a framework for understanding the mechanisms of national conflict.

Clausewitz’s work was likened to Darwin’s in biology, defining the life-history of nations, but neither thinker was concerned with the ethics of the struggle they studied, treating the condition as neither moral nor immoral, comparable to natural phenomena like famine or disease.

Military Forces: Organization and Deployment

Military forces are examined through four lenses: numerical strength and organization, condition independent of combat, maintenance, and their relation to ground. This analysis emphasizes these as necessary conditions for fighting, recognizing their intimate connection with and reciprocal influence on actual combat. These factors precede the engagement itself, laying the groundwork for effective military action.

The Relationship of Power and Arms

Modern military history shows numerical superiority is increasingly decisive due to armies being equally matched in arms. While courage still multiplies power, outcomes depend on a commander's talent and troop experience. Inferior forces must pursue moderate, shorter operations, with greater disparities demanding extreme energy or even a desperate final blow.

An unbiassed look at modern military history suggested that numerical superiority was becoming increasingly decisive, making the principle of assembling the greatest possible numbers for a decisive battle more important than ever.

Army Disposition, Advance Guards, and Outposts

Modern warfare intimately connects pre-battle situations with combat. Army disposition prioritizes preservation and security, requiring subsistence, shelter, a secure rear, and suitable troop distribution. Advance guards and outposts act as the army's "eyes," observing and gaining time. Their strength varies based on desired time gain and expected opposition, with larger modern armies necessitating more robust security measures.

Sustaining the Army: Camps, Marches, and Subsistence

Cantonments are vital for troop rest, though modern war reduces this. Marches demand troop care and precise movement; large armies must be divided into combat-ready columns. Marches cause immense attrition (sickness, stragglers), as seen in Napoleon's 1812 campaign, requiring reinforcement planning. Subsistence evolved from rigid magazine systems to flexible requisition, profoundly influencing operational choices.

The losses attributed to marches were enormous: Napoleon’s central army lost 95,000 men to sickness and stragglers (a third of the force) during the 52 days between the Niemen and Smolensk in 1812, despite minimal combat.

Strategic Foundations: Base and Lines of Communication

An army's base is its essential rear territory, providing supplies and reinforcements, fundamentally limiting its operational direction. Lines of communication are vital arteries connecting the army to its base and serving as retreat routes. Their vulnerability significantly increases in enemy territory, where an invading army is restricted to established lines, making them prime targets for interdiction and cutting off retreat.

Terrain and its Impact on Warfare

Terrain profoundly influences military action by creating obstacles, hindering sight, and offering cover. Difficult terrain (mountains, woods, marshes, cultivated areas) reduces the influence of supreme command, favoring independent subordinate action and national armies. Infantry gains a decided advantage in such conditions, while cavalry becomes largely ineffective. Artillery is also hampered in wooded areas but less so in cultivated or mountainous regions.

Principles of Offensive and Defensive Strategy

Defense is defined as warding off a blow, characterized by a state of expectancy. Military defense is always relative, requiring offensive counterstrokes. It is intrinsically stronger than offense due to the inherent ease of preservation and the aid of locality. War naturally progresses from defense to offense once superiority is achieved, as a purely passive war would be illogical and ineffective.

Defensive Battle and Fortresses

Any position utilizing ground for protection while accepting combat is defensive. For a decisive outcome, a defensive battle must incorporate an offensive counterstroke. The ideal defensive battle involves a prepared position with entrenchments and concealed reserves. Once the attacker commits, a powerful counterstroke is launched against their center of gravity. Fortresses act as strategic instruments, protecting territories and providing essential points d'appui.

Specific Terrain Defenses: Mountains, Rivers, Swamps, Forests

Mountain defense excels at gaining time but is ill-suited for decisive battles due to hindered movement and restricted views. Rivers are unforgiving barriers, requiring rapid concentration to defeat crossings. Swamps are formidable obstacles demanding strong, local defense. Forests are valuable for concealment and partisan warfare, but direct defense of them is hazardous for a regular army, making them ideal for supporting national levies.

Strategic Defensive Operations: Retreat and National Armament

A voluntary retreat deep into the country is an indirect defense aimed at destroying the enemy through attrition, gaining crucial time and exploiting logistical vulnerabilities. Arming the nation (people's war) is a diffuse, dispersed operation unsuited for concentrated attacks, but highly effective in harassing enemy communications and supporting a regular army. It requires specific conditions like extensive terrain and a loyal populace.

Overall Defense of a Theatre of War

The ultimate goal is peace through victory, prioritizing the destruction of enemy forces over territorial occupation. Concentration of force to strike the enemy's center of gravity is paramount for a wide-ranging victory. Defense entails both a decision and a state of expectation, seeking to gain battle advantage through concentrated positions, exploiting enemy bypass attempts, or initiating offensive battles when circumstances are favorable.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core philosophical approach of Clausewitz's theories on war?

Clausewitz viewed war as a natural phenomenon, devoid of inherent moral or immoral judgment, similar to Darwin's biological analyses. He saw it as a tool of policy, emphasizing the preservation of national interests through a combination of defensive and offensive actions.

Why is numerical superiority emphasized as increasingly decisive in modern warfare?

Modern armies are often equally matched in arms and training, making the quantity of forces, talent of the Commander-in-Chief, and troop experience the primary differentiators. Superior numbers allow for decisive battles and compensate for less favorable conditions.

What is the primary advantage of the defensive form of warfare according to Clausewitz?

The defensive is inherently stronger because preservation is easier than acquisition. It benefits from delays, utilizing the advantages of locality and ground. However, a purely passive defense is contradictory to war; it must incorporate active counterstrokes to achieve victory.

How do logistics, specifically subsistence, impact military operations in modern warfare?

Modern armies, being immense and continuously engaged, require sustained logistical support. The shift from rigid magazine systems to flexible requisition from the countryside influences operational choices, making populated areas strategically favorable for supply.

What role do "people's wars" or national armament play in Clausewitzian defense strategy?

A people's war, or national armament, is a dispersed, attrition-focused defense, unsuited for concentrated blows but effective in harassing enemy communications. It should combine with a regular army, especially in extensive or difficult terrain, to wear down the aggressor.